The IMF has a particularly gloomy assessment of the
[Australian Broadcasting Corporation]
< <:))))<>< <:))))<>< <:))))<>< Various experts' appraisals of the U.S. economy <:))))<>< <:))))<>< <:))))<>< <:))))<
The IMF has a particularly gloomy assessment of the
[Australian Broadcasting Corporation]
The new Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout package that was passed into law on Saturday provides Paulson with $300 billion of taxpayer dollars to shore up the faltering mortgage behemoths.
In order to accomplish this, Congress increased the national debt by a whopping $800 billion sending it over the $10 trillion mark for the first time in history! (Naturally, Congress buried this little tidbit of information deep in the 600 pages of legislation.)
The Fed has already spent more than $300 billion to prop up the teetering banking system in the last year alone, plus buying the toxic bonds from Bear Stearns in the JP Morgan acquisition.
Now, the Treasury has been authorized by Congress to buy an "unlimited amount" of Fannie and Freddie shares at their own discretion. They are presently exchanging Fannie and Freddie securities for US Treasury's, which means that the dollar is now backed by dodgy mortgage-backed sludge (MBS) for which there is no market. According to Rep Ron Paul, "This is the asset (MBS) which now backs up our currency. An asset that no one else wants. If they were to dump these securities on the market today, the value of these stocks would go straight to 0. But that is literally the asset that is behind our currency. It is a very serious situation."
[Excerpts of an article by
"Not since the Great Depression have we seen an economic crisis of the magnitude that we are facing today," he says.
The former presidential candidate has reemerged with a Web site spotlighting the soaring budget deficit: more than $9.3 trillion and growing.
He says the purpose of the site, which is not affiliated with any political party, is "to provide accurate information to every citizen about the serious economic problems facing our country."
[CNN]
Note: Mr. Perot points out that 9.3 trillion dollar bills placed end-to-end would reach the moon and back 1,900 times.
Four or five bank failures of equal size and the FDIC will be underwater, which is a serious problem since even conservative estimates expect bank failures to run into the hundreds.
But Indymac is small potatoes compared to the liabilities of the two mortgage behemoths, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. As the housing bubble continues to fizzle; Fannie and Freddie could face losses of $500 billion or more.
Obviously, this is going to come to an end. Foreigners are not charitable organizations, and they're going to demand that we pay them back.
No single country owning large amounts of dollar-based investments is inclined to dump them abruptly; nobody aims to start a panic. But fears have begun to grow that one day a country may get spooked that another is about to dump its dollars--and that could trigger pre-emptive panic selling.
The
[Excerpt of an article by Peter S. Goodman, NY Times]
"I was a relative optimist, but I've certainly become more pessimistic," said Alan S. Blinder, an economist at Princeton, and a former vice chairman of the board of governors at the Federal Reserve. "The financial system looks substantially worse now than it did a month ago."
Mr. Blinder added, this is like the Great Depression. "We haven't seen this kind of travail in the financial markets since the 1930s," he said.
More than two years ago, Nouriel Roubini, an economist at the Stern School of Business at New York University, said that the housing bubble would give way to a financial crisis and a recession. He was widely dismissed as an attention-seeking Chicken Little. Now, Mr. Roubini says the worst is yet to come, because the account-squaring has so far been confined mostly to bad mortgages, leaving other areas remaining--credit cards, auto loans, corporate and municipal debt. “We're not even a third of the way there."
Where will the banks raise the huge sums needed to replenish the capital they have apparently lost? And what will happen if they cannot? The answers to these questions are unknown, an unsettling void that holds much of the economy at a standstill.
[Excerpt of an article by Peter S. Goodman, NY Times]
Merrill Lynch said foreign governments had added $241 billion of
Brian Bethune, chief financial economist at Global Insight, said the US Treasury had two or three days to put real money behind its rescue plan for Fannie and Freddie or face a dangerous crisis that could spiral out of control.
Fannie and Freddie - the world's two biggest financial institutions - make up almost half the $12 trillion US mortgage industry. But that understates their vital importance at this juncture. They are now serving as lender of last resort to the housing market, providing 80pc of all new home loans.
Roughly $1.5 trillion of Fannie and Freddie AAA-rated debt - as well as other
[The Telegraph]
In his second day of congressional testimony on Wednesday, Fed boss Ben Bernanke said inflation was too high and it was a key objective for the central bank to bring it down. Many analysts now believe that the central bank may have to leave borrowing costs on hold, or even increase them, as it tries to steer a faltering economy through turbulent times.
Gary Thayer, from Wachovia Securities, says that the Fed is facing a tricky balancing act. "This increases concern that the Fed is not going to be able to lower interest rates if the economy remains weak."
But he added: "And as long as the economy remains weak, it will be hard for the Fed to raise rates to fight inflation."
[BBC News]
In 1933, about a quarter of US banks failed, [but things were more solid] because US banks in the 1920s had been relatively conservative in their lending, with many banks requiring a 50% down payment for home mortgage loans, for example. The main problem in 1932-33 was quite simply liquidity; the Fed failed to supply adequate reserves to the banking system, so crises of confidence in individual banks led to panic withdrawals of deposits that caused the banks themselves to fail.
This time around, the problem is the opposite.
Fannie and Freddie are probably toast. Federal Reserve Board chairman Ben Bernanke's statement that the two companies can discount paper with the Fed may prolong the inevitable, but also increases its likely huge cost to taxpayers.
A total collapse of the
[Excerpt of an article by Martin Hutchinson, a retired international merchant banker, writing in the
As the bank was shuttering offices and laying off employees nervous … depositors were pulling out $100 million a day. The bank’s stock price had plummeted to less than $1 as analysts predicted the company’s imminent demise.
The takeover of IndyMac came amid rampant speculation that the federal government would also have to take over lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which together stand behind almost half of the nation’s mortgage debt.
Meanwhile Forbes reports that the FDIC is monitoring 90 institutions with assets of $26 billion that it has identified as troubled.
"A rebound at this stage is not something I think is in the immediate outlook," he added.
[Reuters]
[For the past year] we've seen a fairly consistent pattern to the economic mood swings. Every three months or so, there's a round of bad news about housing, followed by warnings of more bank write-offs and then a string of disappointing corporate earnings reports. Eventually, things stabilize and there are hints that the worst may be behind us. Stocks regain some of their lost ground, bonds fall and then -- bam -- the whole cycle starts again.
The last hope for a second-half rebound began to fade earlier this month when Lehman Brothers reported that it wasn't as immune to the credit-market downturn as it had led everyone to believe. It could be the next Bear Stearns. Since then, there has been a steady drumbeat of worrisome news from nearly every sector of the economy.
Like the rain-swollen waters of the Mississippi River, this sudden surge of downbeat news has now overflowed the banks of economic policy and broken through the levees of consumer and investor confidence. At this point, there's not much to do but flee to safety, rescue those in trouble and let nature take its course. And don't let anyone fool you: It will be a while before things return to normal.
[Excerpt of an article by Steven Pearlstein, Washington Post]